Blord, VeryDarkMan Feud Deepens as Court Case Sparks Online Divide

Social media has been abuzz with conversations surrounding crypto entrepreneur Blord and activist VeryDarkMan (VDM), following reports of a legal dispute between both figures.

According to claims circulating online, Blord was recently arraigned in court over allegations including forgery, impersonation, and unauthorized use of VeryDarkMan’s identity in promotional materials. The charges reportedly stem from accusations that Blord used VDM’s name, image, and likeness in advertisements and public campaigns without consent, as well as claims of misleading the public about an alleged endorsement deal.

It was also alleged that Blord falsely stated during a livestream that he paid VeryDarkMan 500 million naira as an ambassadorial fee, a claim now forming part of the dispute.

Blord has denied all allegations and pleaded not guilty. His legal team reportedly applied for bail, but the court deferred the decision to allow the prosecution respond, resulting in a delay that could see him remain in custody for several weeks pending further hearings.

The development has divided public opinion, with some Nigerians arguing that Blord’s actions, if proven, warrant legal consequences, while others believe the situation reflects a broader clash between two controversial online figures.

Amid the legal tension, Blord took to Instagram to address the situation, accusing VeryDarkMan of abandoning earlier claims of handling their issues outside the legal system.

“Let it be in history that Blord is the first man who gave VDM a taste of his own medicine… I thought you said we will do it the street way that neither of us is going to sue, what changed?” he wrote, adding that the activist had now turned to legal action.

As reactions continue to pour in and both sides hold their ground, the case has quickly become one of the most talked-about online disputes in recent weeks.

We will continue to provide updates as the story unfolds.